[MS] Microspeak: Closing out, duping out - devamazonaws.blogspot.com

Windows has gone through many defect tracking systems. The details may change, but the overall shape remains the same. I will defer details to this summary in the Azure DevOps documentation.

One possible Reason for resolution is Duplicate, which means that the issue is already covered by another work item. The act of marking a work item as Duplicate is informally known as duping out. So you can say, "There are three new bugs today, but they are all the same issue as bug 31415, so I've duped them out."

Similarly, the act of marking a resolved work item as Closed is informally known as closing out. "Please look at your resolved bugs and close out the ones that no longer repro."

(Repro is a common abbreviation for reproduce.)

In both cases, the out is optional. You can say that you have duped a work item (to another work item), and you can say that you have closed a work item.

I find it interesting that the preferred adverbial preposition for "changing the status of a work item to move it further down the lifecycle" is "out". I suspect that is used because the change in state causes the work item to disappear from a query, so it's "out of the way".

Also interesting is that you can't "resolve out" a bug, even though that follows the same pattern of moving a work item further down the lifecycle.


Post Updated on February 20, 2024 at 03:00PM
Thanks for reading
from devamazonaws.blogspot.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

[MS] Pulling a single item from a C++ parameter pack by its index, remarks - devamazonaws.blogspot.com

In my earlier discussion of pulling a single item from a C++ parameter pack by its index , I noted that with the Pack Indexing proposal, you would be able to write this to pull an item from a parameter pack while preserving its reference category. template<int index, typename...Args> void example(Args&&... args) { auto&& arg = (Args...[index]&&)args...[index]; using Arg = Args...[index]&&; } Why did I need to apply the (Args...[index]&&) cast ? Why can't I just write this: auto&& arg = args...[index]; or possibly decltype(auto) arg = args...[index]; Well, when you write the name of a variable, the result is an lvalue reference, even if the variable is an rvalue reference . Watch: struct S { S(S&); // construct from lvalue S(S&&); // construct from rvalue }; void whathappens(S&& s) { S t = s; // which will it use? } Try it out in your favorite compiler. This code construc...
Read more

[MS] Boosting Azure DevOps Security with GHAS Code Scanning - devamazonaws.blogspot.com

Image
Debjyoti Ganguly shares insights on the security benefits and configuration of GHAS Code Scanning with Azure DevOps. Boosting Azure DevOps Security with GHAS Code Scanning Code scanning, a pipeline-based tool available in GitHub Advanced Security, is designed to detect code vulnerabilities and bugs within the source code of ADO (Azure DevOps) repositories. Utilizing CodeQL as a static analysis tool, it performs query analysis and variant analysis. When vulnerabilities are found, it generates security alerts. CodeQL CodeQL is a powerful static analysis tool used for showing vulnerabilities and bugs in source code. It enables developers to write custom queries that analyze codebases, searching for specific patterns and potential security issues. By converting code into a database format, CodeQL allows for sophisticated, database-like queries to detect flaws. CodeQL in Action 1. Preparing the Code Create a CodeQL Database : Extract and structure the code into a database for analy...
Read more

[MS] Going beyond the empty set: Embracing the power of other empty things - devamazonaws.blogspot.com

The empty set contains nothing. This sounds really silly, but it's actually really nice. The Windows Runtime has a policy that if a method returns a collection (such as an IVector ), and the method produces no results, then it should return an empty collection, rather than a null reference . That way, consumers can just iterate over the collection without having to deal with a null test. For example, suppose you have a method Widget:: Get­Associated­Doodads which returns an IVectorView<Doodad> representing the Doodad objects that have been associated with a Widget object. If no Doodad s have been associated with the Widget , then it should return an empty vector, not a null pointer. That allows developers to write the natural-looking code: // C# foreach (var doodad in widget.GetAssociatedDoodads()) { ⟦ process each doodad ⟧ } // C++/WinRT for (auto&& doodad : widget.GetAssociatedDoodads()) { ⟦ process each doodad ⟧ } // JavaScript widget.GetAssociated...
Read more